Alina Charaeva vs Selena Janicijevic Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In recent months, Janicijevic has won 38.83% of points on her second serve, while Charaeva has a slight edge, winning 39.07%. Will this marginal difference influence the match outcome? It might, as this is closely linked to prediction accuracy.
• Janicijevic has been successful in winning 50.25% of her opponent's second serve points, whereas Charaeva wins 52.2%. A similar trend is seen with first serve returns, where Janicijevic manages 34.06%, just behind Charaeva's 35.03%. Do these stats favor Charaeva? Yes, they slightly tilt the scales in her favor.
• When under pressure, Janicijevic saves 46.27% of breakpoints, slightly lower compared to Charaeva's 46.59%. This could provide Charaeva a minor advantage in critical moments.
• Over the last year, Janicijevic has won only 38.89% of matches, while Charaeva has been more dominant with a 61.73% win rate. Does this indicate a stronger performance by Charaeva? Undeniably so.
• Court preferences show Janicijevic excels on clay with a 59% win rate, while Charaeva performs best on hard surfaces, boasting a 67% win rate. Does the surface give Janicijevic any edge? Only if it's on clay.
• Both players compete primarily in Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K. Janicijevic has a lower win rate of 30.56%, compared to Charaeva's 62.03% on the same circuit. Will Charaeva's higher tournament success influence the outcome? Likely, yes.
• Janicijevic battles against opponents with a better average ranking of 254.3, whereas Charaeva faces players averaging at 281.81, hinting that Janicijevic plays against tougher competition. Does this affect prediction? Not significantly when Charaeva's win rates are considered.
• If the match extends to a deciding set, Janicijevic claims victory 38% of the time, whereas Charaeva wins 55%, suggesting Charaeva may handle pressure situations better.
• Janicijevic converts 37.04% of her breakpoint opportunities, slightly lower than Charaeva's 39.64%, potentially indicating stronger service break ability in Charaeva.

Editorial Prediction (July 8, 2025, UTC):

In this upcoming match, several factors favor Charaeva over Janicijevic. While both players exhibit minor differences in their second serve and return game performance, Charaeva consistently inches ahead in these areas. Her slightly better numbers in breakpoint conversion and match-winning percentages imply stronger performance under pressure.

Janicijevic has demonstrated resistance against higher-ranked opponents but struggles to maintain momentum in deciding sets, where Charaeva statistically excels. This resilience might give Charaeva the upper hand in crucial match situations.

Additionally, Charaeva’s superior record in the Challengers/ITF circuit suggests she might adapt better to competition dynamics. Taking these elements into account, I predict that Charaeva is more likely to emerge victorious in this match.